thebs wrote:Darr Valen wrote:Nice thing about that forced downtime, I finally got my monitor re-calibrated back to where it should have been, after the idiots at my warranty company screwed up all my settings.
It really is time to get a new 34" 21:9 2k screen already.
Any reason you're looking to the Anamorphic aspect? Do you already have one?
I went back'n forth on getting a new LCD, as I just played on a simple, 1080p 60Hz 3Dtv. I was looking for a 4K LCD TV that also did 1080p @120Hz so I could get a smooth framerate. I also looked at some G-sync and other, 144Hz options.
But in the end, I just went VR instead. Too many 120Hz panels really cannot do that refresh rate, not at the matrix size they run. But I still looked at it.
-
viewtopic.php?f=9&t=5074
Well I went through the "what to get" debate way back at the start of the year. I'm not getting VR Gen 1, and the 1xxx/4xx GPU are junk partial-improvement generations..So realistically, 4K/60 is not doable unless I want to upgrade my GPU again next year to keep playing new games.
So that leaves me with the practical upgrade, which is either 1440p with a high refresh rate, of anamorphic widescreen in a larger size, but still 1440p, which is still in the realm of 2K performance targets. I get that 21:9 isn't something that is overly supported now, and it sometimes takes res hacks to get it working. It's just one of the things I am considering. Probably between the Asus Gsync 27" 2560x1440p monitor that's 144Hz or something, I forget exactly, or the 34" 21:9 screen from either Asus or Acer, both are arguably the same overall.
I might end up keeping 1080 for another year as a monitor, who knows. 4K/60 isn't realistic, and VR isn't in Gen 2, which I feel I need to spend the price for it. I know what 100hz+ looks like, and I know what 1440/1600p looks like. Neither is a real gamble, but is an improvement.
Anywhop, only 3,859.96LY to Jaques Station.