Cmdr Kharma wrote:No.....I meant..
One 970 was the same as Tors 2 x 970's in SLI......
But as he explained later the test does not support SLI so that would explain it....
Roger is the one with the 970 SLI setup, I have a single 980 TI.
Cmdr Kharma wrote:No.....I meant..
One 970 was the same as Tors 2 x 970's in SLI......
But as he explained later the test does not support SLI so that would explain it....
Roger Wilco Jr wrote:...The average fidelity is about on par with the GTX 980 Ti, but the frames tested was quite a bit higher.
I also performed the 3D Mark Fire Strike benchmark test and was a little underwhelmed. My dual GTX 970 SLI setup scored over 15k, but the GTX 1080 only scored about 16.3k, which is only about 5-10% faster. This is still a few percent slower than Wolf's 980 Ti setup, but he has a newer/faster i7 6700k CPU, which I assume explains that. I updated to the latest drivers and it was slightly slower.
Still, it is only a single card and nothing is overclocked or anything. I suppose I could squeeze some more performance out of the system, but I hope I won't need to for ED in VR.
Roger Wilco Jr wrote:The 1080 is only running in the 60's. If I do attempt some OC, I may need to boost the fans.
GlobusDiablo wrote:During the Steam VR test?
Roger Wilco Jr wrote:GlobusDiablo wrote:During the Steam VR test?
I wasn't really paying attention. I reran the test a few times and these are the results:
Idle = 34 C, 139 MHz, 0 RPM
Gaming mode (100%) = 68 C, 1898 MHz, 1750 RPM, 15214 frames
OC Mode (102%) = 72 C, 1924 MHz, 1925 RPM, 15669 frames
Silent Mode (97%) = 65 C, 1797 MHz, 1600 RPM, 14860 frames
The fans kick on at about 59 C and ramp up. I couldn't hear them over the ambient noise.
It's funny how thier quality scale apparently stops at 11. I can hear it now:
Why not just make your scale max out at 10?
Ours goes to 11.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kuKvl1WPM6s
Return to “Hardware and Technical”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 102 guests