Got this....
Waiting for this.....
Cmdr Kharma wrote:Got this....
maznow.jpg
Waiting for this.....
mazfb.jpg
Whenever I get tired of the Rift, I just recently traded one of these -- which are cheap for us Americans (<<US$50K -- it's not that we don't love Porsches and Ferraris, they are just too expensive in the US for the same handling and performance of a GM) for a '16 Camaro SS (which is just as fast, and handles just as good, despite the height/weight, other than breaking) ...Cmdr Kharma wrote:Got this....
maznow.jpg
Waiting for this.....
mazfb.jpg
JustSomeGuy wrote:You just might need a GTX 1080 for that 90fps.
Just tried a GTX 1070 in an icefield, with fps locked to 60. When firing lasers, on first rock GPU usage was around 75% but on the 2nd rock it was 95% as it was smaller so that I could see much of the field too and not just one big ice cube filling the screen.
This was on 1440p screen with pretty high settings (mostly high quality settings, some on ultra), and I watched the GPU usage with GPU-Z.
I hope this helps.
Edit: Took one more rock, went really close so there was a lot of particles flying around. Fps dropped to 40 while drilling.
TorTorden wrote:I have seen less than 45.
But that was in a full wing on a planet and they where all reporting somewhat "wierd" behaviour.
A restart of the game and everything was honky dory smooth again.
I am not really seeing to much of the god in fact maybe even less than the vive but I suspect my glasses interacted with the lenses there compounding the issue.
TorTorden wrote:http://imgur.com/a/pmQPt
Here's my glasses, the vive has a bit more space to spare. But to me it really isn't much of an issue once either is on.
Taking them on and off though is less than optimal for either.
Return to “Hardware and Technical”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 75 guests