TorTorden wrote:Worst case scenario I will reconsider contacts again. (Used contacts in the late 90's)
Being in Florida, hitting the beach a lot, I have daily disposables. E.g., a 90 day supply runs me $90, and I get 2.5-3 years out of 90 days (i.e., one set every 10-12 days).
But ... as I hit my late 30s, and now into my 40s, I have the added issue of presbyopia when corrected. I.e., I can see up close, but with correction, I can no longer as I age. It has to do with the muscles and the added focus required when lenses, contacts or glasses, are involved. With glasses, I can look below or lift them up, but that's not possible with contacts. I need at least +1.50 reading glasses when wearing contacts now. There are new laser techniques to "stimulate" the muscles and counter some of the presbyopia, but it's still in its infancy. It's part of the reason I haven't has PRK (which is better than Lasik in many ways, don't get me started, longer recovery period though), but am hopeful in another 5-10 years.
I'll be fine with VR, as I won't have to focus on objects that seem less than 6" (15cm) in front of me. It's only within 4" (10cm) that the presbyopia shows up. So if you wore contacts some 20 years ago, you will not have issues ... especially if you have trouble seeing close when you have your glasses on. It's worse with contacts as you can't just "flip them up."
TorTorden wrote:As someone who has been dependent on glasses for the past 28-30 years now I go for light weight frames anyways. Not the hipster-fashion-I-wish-I-was-smarter, half inch thick black frames.
Yes, I have very small lens frames. It has the added advantage of allowing me to look down and not have to take them off to see very close.
For VR, it'll mean I won't have to take them off. But I still hear the HTC Vive was better in how it fits on the head near the ears where the frames still play a part. Even those of us who wear thin, titanium frames.